The 10 Best Mobile App Prototyping Tools in 2026

TL;DR: Match your mobile prototyping tool to what you’re testing: wireframes for flows, high-fidelity tools for gestures, or working-app builders for real logic and data. Test on a real phone early, and plan whether you’ll rebuild after validation or keep building.

A mobile app has to feel right under someone’s thumb, and the prototyping tools worth your time support touch gestures and testing on a real phone. Some, including AI app builders, now produce a working app instead of a mockup, so you can keep building on what you tested.

Below are 10 tools ordered from early sketches to a launchable app, each with its mobile strengths, limits, and pricing. You’ll also see what four AI app builders (Lovable, Bolt, Replit, and v0) generate for mobile, plus six prototyping steps and four testing best practices.

For web apps, check out our favorite web app prototyping tools.

What kind of mobile app prototyping tool do you need?

The best mobile app prototyping tool depends on what you’re testing right now:

• Mapping flows and layout: A low-fidelity tool like Balsamiq lets you sketch screens and connect them before anyone debates visual design.
• Testing interactions and gestures: A high-fidelity tool like Figma or ProtoPie shows how swipes, taps, and transitions feel on a phone.
• Putting a working app in front of testers: An app platform like Glide or Bubble lets testers enter information and see the app respond.

Whichever you choose, it should let testers try the prototype on a real phone.

A mobile app prototype is a model of your app that shows how it will look or work before you build it in full. Prototypes fall into three groups:

• Low-fidelity prototypes: Often called wireframes, these are static or near-static drawings that show where buttons, images, and text will go. They help you map user flows and agree on layout, but they don’t show how navigation or interactions feel.
• High-fidelity prototypesHigh-fidelity prototypes: These look close to the finished app and simulate how it will behave, often with interactions and animations that give testers something meaningful to react to.: These look close to the finished app and simulate how it will behave, often with interactions and animations that give testers something meaningful to react to.
• Working apps: AI app builders, app platforms like Glide, and fully visual app builders like Bubble produce an app with working logic and data, so testers enter information and see it respond the way it will after launch.

Top mobile app prototyping tools at a glance

• Best for low-fidelity wireframing: Balsamiq. Sketch screens and map user flows before you move into detailed design. It’s collaborative and quick to learn.
• Best for high-fidelity prototypes: Figma. This widely used design tool simulates how features will work with animations and interactions, and its inspect tools support handoff to developers.
• Best for prototypes intended to become working apps: Bubble. Describe your app to the Bubble AI Agent or share screenshots of your Figma designs to create a fully functional native mobile app. Test your prototype with users, change any part of it, and, if testing goes well, launch that same app to the App Store and Google Play Store instead of rebuilding it.

What to look for in a mobile app prototyping tool

Before you choose, decide what your prototype needs to do:

• Getting early feedback: To see whether your screens and flow make sense, a quick wireframing tool is enough.
• Convincing stakeholders: People outside the project usually need to picture the finished app, which points toward a high-fidelity tool.
• Testing whether a core feature works: For a booking flow or payment step, you need a tool that handles logic and data along with screens.
• Documenting designs before you build: If you’re handing designs to developers, a design-first tool gives you precise screens and documented flows.

Then compare tools on these features:

• Multi-platform previews: Look for phone testing, since a browser preview alone can’t show you thumb reach or how a gesture feels.
• Interactive elements: Testers and stakeholders react better to screens they can tap through, so look for mobile app design elements and animations.
• Rapid iteration: Look for tools with collaborative editing where changes show up in the shared prototype right away.
• Templates and libraries: Pre-built components and mobile icon libraries cut setup time, which matters most when you want to test a flow before investing in custom design.
• User testing support: Check how easily you can share a prototype to testers’ phones. Built-in recording or commenting saves you from stitching tools together.
• How far it takes you: Wireframing and high-fidelity tools stop at a simulation, so once you’ve validated your idea, you’ll build the app somewhere else. Tools that produce a working app let you keep iterating without switching platforms.

The best mobile app prototyping tools (comparison table)

Deep dive: Prototyping tool overviews

We picked these tools because they support mobile-specific work like gestures or on-device testing, and we checked each one’s pricing and features on its own site in October 2026.

1. Balsamiq: Best for low-fidelity designs and brainstorming

Balsamiq is built for early-stage wireframing, and its deliberately hand-drawn look keeps teams focused on flow and layout before they invest in visual design.

Teams sketch and link screens together in the web-based editor, using pre-built UI elements for common patterns. Balsamiq can also generate interactive prototypes from your wireframes.

Best for:

• Early-stage teams aligning on an idea: Rough screens keep the conversation on what the app should do before anyone debates colors and fonts.
• Founders and product managers without a design background: The pre-built elements let you sketch a credible set of screens without learning a full design tool first.

Limitations: Balsamiq stops at wireframes and clickable mockups, so you’ll have to build the app in a different tool once you’ve validated your concept.

Pricing: As of October 2026, Balsamiq offers three editor-based plans with a 14-day free trial and unlimited reviewers, listed on Balsamiq’s pricing page:

• $16 per editor per month billed annually for up to 10 projects, which suits a solo founder or a small team mapping one app.
• Teams: $24 per editor per month billed annually for up to 100 projects, plus a billing admin role and priority support.
• $35 per editor per month billed annually for up to 400 projects, with SSO and a choice of US or EU data storage.

For a faster start, AI design tools can generate screens from a prompt.

2. Uizard: Best for AI-supported screen ideas

Uizard uses AI to generate screens and design elements:

• Generating mobile app screens from text prompts: You describe a screen, like a login page or a product list, and Uizard drafts a layout you can edit.
• Converting images into wireframes: Uizard turns screenshots or hand-drawn sketches into editable designs, which usually need some cleanup.
• Generating design themes and component variations: Apply a new visual style across screens, or compare several versions of a component side by side.

Uizard works best for early ideation, and its canvas editor has fewer features than dedicated design tools like Figma.

Best for:

• Founders at the very start of an idea: AI-generated screens give you something to react to before you commit to a design direction.
• Teams exploring several layouts at once: You compare directions in one session instead of drawing each one by hand.

Limitations: Uizard produces design mockups without logic or data, and its AI-generated screens are starting points you’ll refine before sharing.

Pricing: As of October 2026, Uizard offers four plans, listed on Uizard’s pricing page:

• Up to two projects and three AI generations per month, enough to test whether the AI output suits your style.
• $12 per user per month billed annually for 500 AI generations and up to 100 projects.
• Business: $39 per user per month billed annually for 5,000 AI generations per month and unlimited projects.
• Custom pricing for unlimited projects and increased security, with a 15-seat minimum.

Once you have rough screens, a template-based tool gives you a head start on visual design.

3. Mockplus: Best for templated mobile app design

Mockplus takes a template-first approach, with mobile and web templates, iOS and Android component libraries, and flowcharts for mapping user journeys. It covers both low- and high-fidelity prototyping.

Best for:

• Teams that want to move quickly from wireframe to polished screens: Templates give you a mobile-ready starting point, and most of your time goes into adjusting layouts.
• Designers documenting user journeys: Built-in flowcharts show how screens connect, right next to the screens themselves.

Limitations: Mockplus’s interactions and animations don’t produce working logic, so you’ll need to rebuild in a development environment to ship an app.

Pricing: As of October 2026, Mockplus prices each product (RP, Classic, DT, and Cloud) separately, with figures on Mockplus’s pricing page:

• For Mockplus RP, three prototypes with up to 10 pages each, enough to try the tool on a small project.
• Paid tiers: Mockplus RP Team Ultimate is $24.90 per user per month billed annually, and Mockplus Cloud Pro is $4.95 per user per month billed annually.
• Custom pricing for advanced features and security.

With screens in place, the next question is whether users can find their way through them.

4. Marvel: Best for quick prototyping with built-in user testing

Marvel covers basic prototyping and wireframing with a drag-and-drop editor. It also supports importing designs from Sketch.

Its standout feature is built-in user testing. You invite users to try your prototype and record their screen, audio, and front-facing camera as they move through it. Marvel also supports comments for design feedback.

Best for:

• Teams that prioritize user testing: You run tests and collect recordings in the tool you prototype in, with no separate research platform.
• Teams already working in Sketch: Importing existing designs lets you turn them into testable prototypes without redrawing them.

Limitations: Marvel’s prototyping features are simpler than Figma’s or ProtoPie’s, so it suits quick validation more than detailed interaction design.

Pricing: As of October 2026, Marvel offers four tiers, listed on Marvel’s pricing page:

• An entry-level plan with one project, useful for trying a single prototype. User testing isn’t included.
• An individual paid plan with unlimited projects.
• Team: $42/month billed yearly or $48/month billed monthly for three users and unlimited projects.
• For larger teams that need more users, projects, and testing.

For detailed designs, most teams turn to a dedicated design tool.

5. Figma: Best for design-first prototypes

Many teams design their UI in Figma and turn it into a clickable prototype right there, with interactions, animations, variables, and conditional logic. Figma Make adds a backend, so you can also build functional web apps.

Clickable designs like these work well for review and user testing. Live data takes Figma Make, and native app features take a separate app builder. On Bubble, you can import your Figma designs and add the logic, a database, and native mobile features behind them.

Best for:

• Designers focused on UI: Figma’s design tools give you precise control over layout, type, and components across every screen.
• Teams handing designs to developers: Shared files, comments, and inspect tools make it clear how each screen should look and behave.

Limitations: On their own, Figma designs stay simulations, and Figma Make builds web apps, so native mobile features need a separate app builder.

Pricing: As of October 2026, Figma offers four plans, with pricing that varies by seat type and billing cycle. Details are on Figma’s pricing page.

• Starter: For individuals who need basic design and prototyping tools on a few files.
• Starts at $16 per Full seat per month with annual billing. It suits small teams that need shared libraries and more advanced prototyping.
• Organization: $55 per Full seat per month billed annually, for companies with many teams that want centralized design assets.
• $90 per Full seat per month billed annually, for custom workspaces, advanced features, and security controls.

Once the design is set, an interaction tool makes the prototype feel closer to a finished app.

6. ProtoPie: Best for user testing your high-fidelity prototypes

ProtoPie is built to make mobile interactions feel real. Prototypes respond to gestures and device sensors, and you can add logic or, with the ProtoPie Connect add-on, pull in data from APIs and databases.

Testers open your prototype from a link on a phone, tablet, or desktop, and the Enterprise plan adds Wear OS smartwatches.

Best for:

• Designers testing complex interactions: If your app depends on swipes, tilts, or sensor input, ProtoPie lets testers feel those interactions on their own device.
• Teams whose design is already settled: ProtoPie works best once your screens are final and the open questions are about how they behave.

Limitations: ProtoPie isn’t a production app builder, so you’ll need a separate environment to build and ship the app.

Pricing: As of October 2026, ProtoPie offers four plans, listed on ProtoPie’s pricing page, and yearly billing saves up to 26%:

• Two cloud prototypes with up to eight scenes each and 50MB of storage, enough to try one small flow.
• $25/month billed monthly for one seat and up to 20 cloud prototypes, with a maximum of 10 scenes each.
• $47 per editor per month billed monthly for unlimited prototypes and scenes.
• Custom pricing for advanced features and security, with user testing available as an add-on.

For a broad component library alongside interactions, Proto.io covers both ends of the fidelity range.

7. Proto.io: Best for drag-and-drop prototyping with pre-built components

Proto.io’s drag-and-drop editor comes with templates, UI components, icons, and advanced animations, and it handles everything from quick wireframes to detailed interactive prototypes.

Best for:

• Teams that want one tool from wireframe to high fidelity: You can start rough and add detail in the same project.
• Designers who need a wide range of interactions: The set of events and actions covers most mobile patterns without custom work.

Limitations: Proto.io doesn’t produce a production app, so you’ll move to a development environment when it’s time to ship.

Pricing: As of October 2026, Proto.io offers a Free plan and four paid plans, listed on Proto.io’s pricing page:

• One user and one active project, enough to try a single prototype.
• Freelancer: $24/month billed annually or $29/month billed monthly for one user and up to five active projects.
• Startup: $40/month billed annually or $49/month billed monthly for two users and up to 10 projects.
• Agency: $80/month billed annually or $99/month billed monthly for five users and up to 15 projects.
• Corporate: $160/month billed annually or $199/month billed monthly for 10 users and up to 30 projects.

When your prototype needs to respond to data and conditions, Justinmind goes further.

8. Justinmind: Best for advanced mobile app prototypes

Justinmind is for prototypes that react to what people do. Add conditions and drag-and-drop logic, and screens change based on what testers enter, then check the result in a device emulator. You can also start with rough wireframes and add detail as you go.

Best for:

• Teams that need prototype behavior to depend on data: Conditions and data-driven prototypes let testers see different results based on what they enter.
• Builders who prefer starting from templates: The template library gives you a functional starting point to adapt.

Limitations: Justinmind’s prototypes don’t ship as apps, so you’ll still need a development environment to launch. The desktop app can also feel dated next to browser-based tools like Figma.

Pricing: As of October 2026, Justinmind offers four plans, listed on Justinmind’s pricing page:

• One project with unlimited screens, covering UI design and wireframing.
• Standard: $19 per editor per month, adding advanced interaction design and unlimited projects.
• Professional: $29 per editor per month, adding data simulation, user flows, and HTML export.
• $59 per editor per month, adding SAML single sign-on and Jira integration.

Glide and Bubble go past simulation and produce apps people can use.

9. Glide: Best for rapid prototyping with internal data

If your team already tracks work in Google Sheets, Excel, or Airtable, Glide can turn that data into an app, or you can start from a text prompt instead. There’s no database to set up, since your spreadsheet becomes the data source.

Glide builds Progressive Web Apps (PWAs), which open in a phone’s browser and can be saved to the home screen like an app. They can’t be published directly to the App Store or Google Play Store, though.

Best for:

• Teams building internal tools: If your staff directory, inventory, or field reports already live in a spreadsheet, Glide turns that data into an app your team can use on their phones.
• Operations leads testing a workflow before investing in it: You can put a working version in front of colleagues using data you already maintain.

Limitations: PWAs limit some native mobile features, and Glide no longer supports push notifications. Credit- and member-based pricing can also rise as your team and usage grow.

Pricing: As of October 2026, Glide’s main product, GlideOS, offers five plans with monthly pricing based on AI credits and team members, listed on Glide’s pricing page:

• Free: Two team members and 10 projects, but no published apps, so it suits trying Glide on your own data.
• Basic: $25 per month for 100 credits and two published apps.
• Plus: $50 per month for 250 credits and five published apps.
• Pro: $125 per month for 500 credits plus 50 per member, starting at five members, with unlimited published apps.
• Enterprise: Custom pricing.

For a customer-facing app in the app stores, Bubble takes the prototype all the way to launch.

10. Bubble: Best for building fully functional prototype you can test, launch, and keep building in one place

Bubble is the fully visual app builder where anyone can build software, understand every part of it, and control every detail without code. With Bubble for native mobile apps, the app you test is the app you launch, so there’s no rebuild between validation and the app stores.

You start by describing your idea to the Bubble AI Agent, which asks clarifying questions and drafts a blueprint with you before it generates the UI, database, workflows, privacy rules, and logic.

From there, you keep chatting with the Agent, which explains what it built in plain language, or make precise changes yourself in the visual editor. You can also build your Bubble app from Claude or ChatGPT with the Bubble MCP (beta). Your web and native mobile apps share one database and backend workflows.

SuiteOp, a hospitality operations platform, was running a wrapped mobile app that crashed. The team rebuilt it as a native app on Bubble in two months, compared with an estimated 6–8 months.

“Being able to use the same backend workflows, the same database — those things were really big time savers,” says Jean-Emmanuel Losi, SuiteOp’s co-founder.

Best for:

• Understand: Founders who want to know their app inside out can open any workflow the Agent built and read it as plain steps, and see exactly what data the app stores. When the Agent gets something wrong, you can see where and why.
• Refine: Builders who want to use AI without giving up control can change any part of the app by chatting with the Agent or editing it by hand in the visual editor, down to a single step in a workflow.
• Scale:Teams that need web, iOS, and Android from one backend keep their data and backend logic in one place, so a change to how the app works applies across every platform. You validate with users and publish that same app to the App Store and Google Play Store, with no handoff in between.
• Agencies handing off client work: Because the logic and data are visual, clients can follow how their app works after handoff.

Limitations:

• Learning curve: Bubble’s depth comes with a steeper learning curve than wireframing tools. The Agent explains what it built in plain language, so you learn how the app works as you go.
• Moving to code: If you ever need the app in code, the Bubble MCP lets an AI agent like Claude Code or Codex rebuild it in code you own and host.
• In-app purchases (beta): These support subscriptions only, so one-time purchases aren’t available yet.
• Testing on your own phone: A dev build requires a paid plan and an app store connection. On the Free plan, you can preview the mobile app with the Simulated device option.

Pricing: Getting started on Bubble is free, though apps on the Free plan can’t go live. All plans are listed on our pricing page:

• Starter Mobile: $42/month billed annually or $49/month billed monthly, for a native iOS and Android app on its own.
• Starter Web & Mobile: $59/month billed annually or $69/month billed monthly, for a web app and native mobile app on one backend.
• Starter Web: $32/month billed annually or $39/month billed monthly, for a web app on its own.

Every plan includes a monthly AI credit allowance, and generating an app or working in the visual editor doesn’t use AI credits. If you run out, the Agent keeps the work it finished and the visual editor keeps working. App store developer fees may apply when you publish.

Native mobile on Bubble: See how Bubble builds apps for iOS and Android.

A note on Sketch, Adobe XD, InVision, Axure RP, and Framer

You may notice a few familiar names missing:

• Adobe XD: It’s in maintenance mode, so it’s a risky choice for a new project.
• InVision: It shut down its design and prototyping services at the end of 2024.
• Framer: It now focuses on websites, not mobile app prototypes.
• Sketch: Its editor is Mac-only, which limits teams working across operating systems.
• Axure RP: It leans toward web and enterprise UX research more than mobile prototyping.

Most of the tools above stop at a simulation, while AI app builders generate a working app from a prompt.

AI app builders for functional mobile prototypes

AI app builders generate a first version of your app from a prompt. Some produce native mobile apps; others build web apps, sometimes wrapped for mobile. But all of them write the logic, data, and permissions in code, so changing how the app works takes another prompt that costs credits or a direct code edit. If you don’t work with code, that gives you less direct control over details like what happens when a payment fails or who can see certain data.

The table below compares what each tool generates and how you can publish it to the app stores.

Lovable: Best for polished web app prototypes

Lovable generates React and TypeScript web apps from a prompt. As of October 27, 2026, its visual editing covers text only, and other UI changes go through chat or a sketch on the preview, which use credits.

It doesn’t generate native iOS or Android apps (its own mobile app is for building from your phone), so it fits best when a mobile-friendly web app is enough for testing.

Bolt: Best for React Native prototypes built through chat

You chat with Bolt to generate React Native apps built with Expo.

Publishing to the App Store or Google Play Store happens outside Bolt, so plan for that step, and for working with the generated code, if you intend to launch.

Replit: Best for builders who want code alongside their prototype

Replit generates React Native apps with Expo inside a full coding workspace. It supports a guided App Store publishing flow for iOS apps, but publishing to the Google Play Store isn’t supported yet.

Replit suits builders who are comfortable with code and want full access to it. If you don’t read code, expect to rely on prompts for most changes to how the app works.

v0: Best for web app prototypes that deploy to Vercel

v0 generates web apps and deploys them directly to Vercel. Its Design Mode lets you make visual tweaks to styles and layout.

Like Lovable, v0 doesn’t generate native mobile apps, and its iOS app is for building on the go.

Where Bubble fits among AI app builders

On Bubble, there's no code; every layer is visual. You can chat with the Agent to generate a native mobile app or use the Bubble MCP with tools like Claude or Codex. Then you can open any workflow and read it as plain steps, like “When someone signs up, send a welcome message.”

If you’ve already prototyped in an AI coding tool, universal import lets you see how every part of that app works. Upload a .zip or .html file, or import through the Bubble MCP, and Bubble generates a fully visual app from it, with the logic and data laid out where you can read and edit them.

When the Agent gets something wrong, you fix that step in the visual editor yourself. That matters because re-prompting has limits: A December 2025 study found that AI models’ debugging ability drops 60–80% after just two or three attempts.

Bubble has a learning curve, but the time you spend learning how workflows and data fit together gives you more control over your app. The Agent explains what it builds as you go, so you can make changes yourself and keep building as your app grows.

Whichever tool you pick, the process of prototyping a mobile app well looks much the same.

How to prototype a mobile app, step by step

Working through these steps in order keeps you from spending weeks on features nobody wants.

Step 1: Define the one job your app does

Describe the one problem your app solves as a concrete outcome: “Help freelancers track billable hours” works better than “productivity tool.” The more specific you are, the easier every later decision becomes.

The same description doubles as your first prompt if you’re using an AI app builder. For example: “A mobile habit tracker where users log one habit a day, see a weekly streak, and get a reminder at a time they choose.”

Step 2: Map the user flow and the data behind it

List the key screens on the path from opening your app to finishing the core task, then write down the data each one needs. A workout tracker, for example, needs exercise types, durations, and dates. Mapping data early saves rework, because it shows which screens depend on which information.

Step 3: Sketch low-fidelity wireframes

Start with paper or a whiteboard, or use a low-fidelity tool like Balsamiq. Draw boxes for buttons, lines for navigation, and arrows showing how users move from screen to screen. This step reveals gaps in your flow before you spend time on detailed design.

Step 4: Add interactions, gestures, and transitions

Move to a high-fidelity tool and add the swipe actions, long presses, and screen transitions that make a mobile app feel like one. This is where you find out whether your navigation makes sense when people tap through it.

Step 5: Test on a phone with real users

A computer screen hides mobile-specific issues. Load your prototype on a phone to check touch target sizes and thumb reach. Then watch a few users try to complete the core job without your help, and note every point where they hesitate.

Step 6: Decide whether to rebuild or keep building

Once your prototype is validated, you can hand the designs to a developer to rebuild in code, or use a platform that turns the prototype into the launched app. Rebuilding gives a development team a clean start, while keeping the prototype saves you from re-creating what testers already approved. On Bubble, the app you prototype becomes your production app, so you keep building on it after validation.

Mobile app prototyping best practices

These principles help you get clearer answers from every round of testing.

Design for thumbs, not cursors

Phone screens are small, and people navigate with their thumbs. Place primary navigation at the bottom of the screen, where it stays within reach.

Make touch targets large enough to tap reliably. Apple’s Human Interface Guidelines recommend controls of at least 44x44pt, and Android’s accessibility guidelines recommend touch targets of at least 48x48dp.

Match fidelity to the question you’re testing

Don’t build a high-fidelity prototype to test a basic user flow. If you want to know whether the steps make sense, a low-fidelity wireframe keeps testers focused on structure. Save high fidelity for testing specific interactions, animations, and visual design.

Prototype the unhappy paths

Beyond the ideal user journey, build screens for the moments when things don’t go to plan. Users will hit all of these, so your prototype should show how the app handles them:

• Empty states: Show what a new user sees before they’ve added anything, like a habit tracker with no habits logged yet.
• Error messages: Show what happens when a payment fails or a form is missing a required field, and how the user recovers.
• Offline mode: Show whether people can still see information they already loaded when they lose signal.
• Denied permissions: Show what happens when someone declines camera or location access, and how they can turn it on later.

Plan for what happens after the prototype

Keep notes on the logic and data behind your designs, like what happens when a user taps a button. Those notes save a developer from guessing, or become your starting point if you build the app yourself.

Ready to build a prototype for your mobile app?

Choose the tool that fits what you’re testing right now, and get your prototype onto a real phone as early as you can. The bigger choice comes after testing: Start over in a new tool, or keep building on the app people already tried.

On Bubble, you can skip that rebuild. You’ll have a working web and native mobile app you can take all the way to the app stores, and you can change any part of it yourself as testers tell you what they need. Describe your idea to the Agent, shape the blueprint together, and get started for free.

Frequently asked questions about mobile app prototyping tools

Can I bring a prototype from Lovable, Bolt, or Replit into Bubble?

Yes, with universal import, you upload your app as a .zip or .html file or import it through the Bubble MCP (beta), and Bubble generates a new, fully visual app from it. The result won’t match the original exactly, but its logic and data are visible and editable, so you can refine it with the Bubble AI Agent or by hand.

Can I test my mobile prototype on my own phone without a paid plan?

On Bubble’s Free plan, you can preview your mobile app with the Simulated device option in the web preview. Testing on your own phone, including push notifications and other hardware features, takes a dev build, which requires a paid plan and an app store connection.

What happens if I run out of AI credits while prototyping?

On Bubble, the Bubble AI Agent stops, keeps the work it finished, and summarizes what’s left to do, and the visual editor keeps working so you can keep building by hand. On paid plans, you can buy more AI credits anytime, and nothing is charged automatically.

Do I need design or coding experience to prototype a mobile app?

No, most tools here use drag-and-drop editors and templates, so you can prototype if you understand how software works but don’t write code. On Bubble, the Bubble AI Agent explains what it builds in plain language, and with native mobile app generation (beta), it builds iOS and Android apps whose logic and data stay visual and editable.

What’s the best tool for prototyping a mobile app?

It depends on what you’re testing: Balsamiq suits early wireframes, Figma and ProtoPie suits high-fidelity interactions, and Glide, AI app builders, and Bubble produce working apps testers can use on a phone.

Can I publish a mobile app prototype to the App Store or Google Play Store?

Prototypes from simulation tools like Figma, ProtoPie, and Balsamiq can’t be published, so you’ll build the app in another tool, and Glide’s PWAs can’t be published directly to the stores either. Bubble builds native iOS and Android apps you can submit to the App Store and Google Play Store from the editor, so the prototype you test can become the app you launch.

Is ProtoPie better than Figma?

They serve different purposes: Figma is the standard for UI and UX design and basic interactive flows, while ProtoPie is built for high-fidelity user testing with native device sensors, variables, and complex conditional logic. Many teams design in Figma and then bring those designs into ProtoPie for interaction testing.